Social Media in Gay London: Tinder instead of Hook-Up software

Social Media in Gay London: Tinder instead of Hook-Up software

Post Ideas

Freddy MacKee, 14 Taviton Street, London WC1H 0BW, UK. Email: [email protected]

  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Recommendations
  • Cited by
  • PDF


The article explores how cellular application Tinder complements matchmaking practices in addition to wider application ecosystem gay people used in London. Within regional gay society discourse, Tinder is considered as a website where the gay “nice guys” get, rendering the platform as a socially built environment in which homosexual boys behave in a diametrically opposed solution to the normative hyper-sexualized actions of extensive homosexual hook-up software. The investigation matter, therefore, is whether Tinder is certainly a spot in which these “nice dudes” go and where one could find them. Through an ethnographic methods conducted both online and off-line, an incident is made on how initial conceptions regarding the software cannot be totally analyzed or translated without comprehending the put it holds among other internet sites. Research is actually presented to offer the instance that gay customers of Tinder manage, in reality, curate the depiction of these digital personality to provide a considerably much less sexualized persona together with the hopes of locating dates or a relationship. This, however, does not mean that consumers avoid making use of different platforms in synchronous as an easy way of exploring different topic positions and reasons. Actions and normativity on Tinder become mostly described both by perspective also by style of the platform, which imports and displays private information from other social support systems. Results should really be limited by the population and place proposed while the fieldsite.


I’m it’s vital we have actually a location where we could engage people and simply be naughty, you are aware? And also have someplace in which we are able to get and then make the effort attain a genuine go out. (Tag, 31)

In 2015, a narrative on homosexual life and love starred in London: if one desired to meet “quality” homosexual boys 1 into an intimate partnership, one would need check for them on Tinder, a hook-up software made use of largely by a heterosexual customers. This neighborhood report try surprising considering that the specific contrary is often stated by the “straight” 2 equivalent, and it also encourages the study investigated in this essay. Given that cybersociality is part of our daily schedules, and this continues to change along technical advances like the cellular net and a plethora of smartphone software, there clearly was enough space to evaluate cultural beliefs and thinking toward all of them. Mowlabocus (2010) claims of homosexual male traditions as a whole your “communication procedures produced by digital technologies might today in fact feel fully understood as boring and ordinary themselves” (p. 184). While 5 years ago a gay “hook-up” app such Grindr got seen as an emerging trend, hook-up applications have now come to be commonplace and normative, which often leads united states to the need of revising gay sociality through the point of view of not just one single application or affordance, 3 but as a complex planet of apparatus and topic jobs that coexist simultaneously in one’s tool plus in one’s own construction associated with the personal.

Given the breadth of this job of researching homosexual cybersociality, this information happens to be simplified to a single straightforward studies concern: was Tinder really the best room in which the gay “nice men” get, and in which one would locate them? If these somewhere is available, then it might be interesting to understand the way it emerges and do you know the principles to this socially constructed spot.

This post is created through the views of online Anthropology, a sub-field of anthropology that examines the impact of tech on different social groups, and exactly how these communities adjust and reappropriate available technologies (Horst and Miller, 2012). Boellstorff (2012) defines it analyzing “the partnership between your digital (the web) as well as the real (the bodily or traditional)” (p. 39), and that’s why this venture isn’t only an easy evaluation of on line connections therefore aims an in-depth comprehension of the proposed inhabitants. This article also includes panorama from “gay net research,” a field which has been affected and shaped mainly by the writers Campbell (2004), Mowlabocus (2010), and not too long ago battle (2014, 2015). Cybersociality fashions are constantly developing, and an item of work similar to this one builds room to think on existing scholastic opportunities on gay males and innovation, plus make a historical registry with the proposed social cluster. Inside framework, Tinder as well as the investigation concern will be the place to start for this data and not the delimiting border.

Through ethnographic records, we will have that Tinder is culturally built as a certain host to sociality featuring its very own principles, but this development is based on the perspective of different social media 4 programs aswell. For this reason we deal with the idea of “polymedia” first recommended by Madianou and Miller (2012), exactly who determine positive singles the word as “a constellation of various mass media as an integral ecosystem in which each moderate locates its specific niche about the others” (p. 3). During my studies, i’ve found it impossible to attempt to recognize one platform inside isolation, since the medium is actually sure to other media just as that the practices for the users are “polymediatic.” Through this task, the person will grasp just how Tinder must be regarded alongside the techniques connected with Grindr, fb, Whatsapp, among others. Furthermore, the challenge of design is investigated as one of the contributing issue of exactly why this system is made as a place that is better suited to internet dating and relationship in comparison to different homosexual networks as well as their affordances.

These studies explores the horizon on social media marketing of homosexual people who happen to live in London from all treks of life—doctors, internet marketers, plumbers, actors, teachers, engineers, marines, baristas, developers. From males who had been when homeless to the people that happen to be today high-profile politicians in London, this work is caused by the undertaking of discovering homosexual sex and romance as a lived skills that goes hand in hand with technology.


The techniques of studies are ethnographic, knowledge this as associate observation, “deep hanging-out,” and interviews. This simply means interacting with someone on programs that represent the mass media ecosystem of the gay sub-culture in London. Facts have also been obtained from our connection with talking and fulfilling up with people who could become enchanting or intimate couples. Correspondingly, a considerable set of informants interacted with me for purposes that gone beyond the only real aim of adding to this research from their attitude, despite getting completely familiar with my status as a researcher. 5 This means that a number of my personal interview happened to be undoubtedly seen as “dates” or as opportunities to start a romantic union, or simply just as problems that could cause informal sex. This does not undermine the findings of the analysis; rather, it has given me use of first-hand accounts which can be complementary toward disclosure of individual anecdotes and stories that my informants would recount.